Search for: "Bush v. United States" Results 881 - 900 of 2,335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
Bush, who fractured the party and the movement that made him. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
Special factors did not counsel hesitation, even where a foreign national sought recompense for the misconduct of U.S. officials outside the United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:31 am by Maureen Johnston
Kerry 13-628Issue: Whether a federal statute that directs the Secretary of State, on request, to record the birthplace of an American citizen born in Jerusalem as born in "Israel" on a Consular Report of Birth Abroad and on a United States passport is unconstitutional on the ground that the statute "impermissibly infringes on the President's exercise of the recognition power reposing exclusively in him." [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:36 am by Jonathan Hafetz
As it stands, district judges have no authority to order the release of a detainee to the United States even when it is the only remedy. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Many people are saying we need a new Court, with proposals for significant reforms such as term limits and court expansion gaining much more mainstream support than imagined twenty years ago (even after Bush v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Wednesday, July 25, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. in Chautauqua’s Hall of Philosophy. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:54 pm
Bush, the Supreme Court's landmark decision last term. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm by Big Tent Democrat
The President's power, as stated in Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution: The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 2:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:21 pm by Georgialee Lang
I think that after the Supreme Court’s foray into Bush v. [read post]