Search for: "CASH v. UNITED STATES" Results 881 - 900 of 2,398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2013, 5:14 am
Miller and Wellons did not purchase an investment unit. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:13 pm by Neil Burns
The legislative history states: "Subparagraph (A) is intended to codify current case law e. g., Neal v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:25 am by SHG
  And so the government came down so hard on her that even the 7th Circuit dissenter in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:08 am by gmlevine
Where the complainant has registered the trademark with “the United States Patent and Trademark Office (or a comparable foreign trademark office)”, the respondent has the burden of rebutting the presumption of validity, Town of Easton Connecticut v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:00 am
Lipp received a cash award of $1,625,000 and restricted stock units valued at $875,025. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am by Fred Wertheimer
FEC, the Court explicitly stated that corruption “extends beyond preventing simple cash-for-votes corruption. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has developed and applied a 2-prong test “drawn directly from the wording of §501(c)(3) and the legislative history of its enactment. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Kevin
As far as I can tell, the Ninth Circuit’s decision last week in Santopietro v. [read post]