Search for: "CRIM"
Results 881 - 900
of 4,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
Crim. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:17 am
Regina v Dobson [2011] EWCA Crim 1256; [2011] WLR (D) 167 “Where the Court of Appeal was considering, for the purposes of quashing an acquittal, whether there was new and compelling evidence, provided the new evidence was reliable, substantial and appeared to be highly probative it would be compelling for the purposes of section 78 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003: otherwise it would not. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:19 am
Hamilton [2007] EWCA Crim 2062 “The ‘two person rule’ applicable to the offence of outraging public decency contrary to common law was capable of being satisfied if there were two or more persons present who were capable of seeing the nature of the act even if they did not actually see it. [read post]
13 May 2008, 8:45 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) King v The Serious Fraud Office [2008] EWCA Crim 530 (18 March 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Harlow-Hayes, R (on the application of) v Cambridge Crown Court [2008] EWHC 1023 (Admin) (21 April 2008) Moulai v Deputy Public Prosecutor in Creteil France [2008] EWHC 1024 (Admin) (09 May 2008) High Court (Patents Court) Rolawn Ltd & Anor v Turfmech Machinery Ltd [2008] EWHC 989 (Pat) (07 May 2008) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 4:43 am
In the field of criminal law, some particularly ghastly examples of bamboozling legislation can be found in various provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 – described by no less an authority than Rose LJ as ‘at best, obscure and, at worst, impenetrable’ (R v Campell [2006] EWCA Crim 726, [2006] 2 Cr App R (S) 626 at [1]).” Full story Halsbury’s Law Exchange, 2nd November 2011 Source: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:16 am
Regina v Lancaster [2010] EWCA Crim 370; [2010] WLR (D) 63 “Where a person was charged with an offence of falsifying a document made or required for an accounting purpose, by omitting a material particular from that document, contrary to s 17 of the Theft Act 1968, the omitted particular was to be regarded as material if it had the effect that the document was liable to mislead in a way which was significant, or in a way which mattered. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:38 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Staffordshire County Council v Challinor & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 864 (17 August 2007) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Hamilton, R v [2007] EWCA Crim 2062 (16 August 2007) High Court (Administrative Court) Secretary of State for the Home Department v AL [2007] EWHC 1970 (Admin) (17 August 2007) High Court (Chancery Division) Hammonds (a firm) v Pro-Fit USA Ltd [2007] EWHC 1998 (Ch) (17 August 2007) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 10:12 am
Crim. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 9:39 am
Crim. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:28 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) M, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2998 (24 November 2011) High Court (Commercial Court) Alliance Bank JSC v Aquanta Corporation & Ors [2011] EWHC 3281 (Comm) (14 December 2011) High Court (Patents Court) Omnipharm Ltd v Merial [2011] EWHC 3393 (Pat) (21 December 2011) Nokia Oyj (Nokia Corporation) v Ipcom GmbH & Co KG [2011] EWHC 3460 (Pat) (21 December 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 am
Supreme Court Sugar v British Broadcasting Corporation & Anor [2012] UKSC 4 (15 February 2012) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Chattoo & Ors v R [2012] EWCA Crim 190 (15 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Spelman v Express Newspapers [2012] EWHC 239 (QB) (15 February 2012) High Court (Family Division) El Gamal v Al Maktoum [2011] EWHC B27 (Fam) (22 December 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:51 am
Regina v Miller [2010] EWCA Crim 1153; [2010] WLR (D) 142 “In criminal proceedings, the circumstances in which one party would be permitted pursuant to s 100(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 to ask a witness a question in cross-examination with a view to eliciting an answer implicating that witness in bad behaviour, which behaviour that party would be otherwise unable to prove, were infrequent and limited in scope. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:47 am
Crim. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:49 am
Regina v Braithwaite [2010] EWCA Crim 1082; [2010] WLR (D) 141 “Material contained in police crime reports that unproven allegations had been made against a person who was someone other than a defendant, or that that person had been investigated in respect of an offence, would rarely be of substantial probative value to an issue at trial sufficient to render it admissible as evidence of bad character against that person pursuant to s 100(1)(b) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) McKenzie v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1550 (23 June 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) County Leasing Ltd v Quotepool Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 705 (23 June 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Paddico (267) Ltd v Kirklees Metropolitan Council & Ors [2011] EWHC 1606 (Ch) (23 June 2011) High Court (Admiralty Division) Samco Europe, The Owners or Charterers of the Ship v MSC Prestige, The Owners or Charterers of the Ship [2011] EWHC 1580 (Admlty) (23 June… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:27 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Callum v R [2010] EWCA Crim 1325 (16 June 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) (16 June 2010) Kotula v EDF Energy Networks (EPN) Plc & Ors [2010] EWHC B11 (QB) (15 June 2010) J Varney & Sons Waste Management Ltd v Hertfordshire County Council [2010] EWHC 1404 (QB) (16 June 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:57 am
Regina v Neish [2010] EWCA Crim 1011; [2010] WLR (D) 116 “The process whereby a judge gave instructions to the court listing office to relist the hearing of confiscation proceedings amounted to a postponement of the proceedings by the court of its own motion and was a valid postponement for the purposes of s 14 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:38 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Joynson, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 3049 (26 November 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) (13 January 2009) High Court (Family Division) S (A Child) v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council & Anor [2008] EWHC 3283 (Fam) (31 December 2008) High Court (Commercial Court) Emmott v Michael Wilson & [...] [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:33 am
Crim. [read post]
