Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 11:29 am
Addressing cross appeals the trial court declined to consider, the court held the EIR did not adequately consider a reasonable range of project alternatives. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:03 am
The defendants appealed the Court’s order granting summary judgment thereafter. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:33 pm
” What prompted the Court’s review of Aguilar-Spinelli in the context of reasonable suspicion is the recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Navarette v California (__ US __, 134 SCt 1683 [2014]). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm
But they still haven't put the U.S. part of the dispute behind them.Yesterday the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard Samsung's appeal of the district court ruling in the first Apple v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 8:49 pm
It would make sense for the appeals court to discuss and adjudge the underlying liability issues and Apple's request for an extraordinary remedy at the same time.In order to bring their appeals on the merits, Apple and Samsung had to wait for a formal final judgment in that second California case. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:30 am
http://t.co/JsYEp4HlIc -> Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Anonymous Speech in California Prop. 35 Case | http://t.co/SSep3AZiDP -> Ontario looking at electronic signatures for real estate deals http://t.co/bJ9L7J9I1O -> Johnson v Steele, Victim of cyber bullying campaign by blogger awarded £70,000 damages http://t.co/W8uRUuMkP4 -> Do we remember the point of the “right to be forgotten”? [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
We accordingly vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:30 am
Hrynew http://t.co/xtdAJlOQoh -> Good faith and honesty contractual obligations says Supreme Court: Bhasin v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
”) California v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:06 am
In Brown v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
Quoting the California case, Estrada v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
* A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again) The Court of Appeal for England and Wales has just issued its decision in Specsavers v Asda, a very well-known saga the previous episodes of which have been severally covered by the IPKat [on initial skirmishes, here and here; on the High Court judgment of Mann J here; on the main decision and referral to Europe by the Court of Appeal here; on… [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
About two-thirds into the opening argument in Jennings v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 2014). [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:36 am
Without having the trial court and/or the Court of Appeal refer to prosecutorial ethics and the duty of a prosecutor to strike hard blows but not foul ones.Or potentially getting the conviction reversed on appeal.Sometimes the right thing to do is to not try so hard. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
United States 13-1309Issue: Whether, when the district court disposes of a motion for a new trial while an appeal is pending in the court of appeals, a defendant must file a second notice of appeal in order for the court of appeals to have jurisdiction to consider the issue that was before the district court in the motion for a new trial. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:21 am
Replacements (Forbes Cross-Post) Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – Summer 2013 Edition Telephone Consumer Protection Act Case Update – February 2013 Edition California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) Court: Customer Consents to Receive Texts by Providing Phone Number to Pharmacy – Pinkard v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 2:23 pm
After the defense filed the opening brief on appeal, the Supreme Court decided Moncrieffe v. [read post]
