Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 881 - 900
of 48,937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
Read the opinion The post STEPHEN NOLAN v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 11:32 am
Only in 2003, with Lawrence v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:22 pm
Rudkin Testamentary Trust v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 10:04 pm
This trend is no more clearly seen than in Teffer v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
Listen to: Hull on Estates Episode #298 – Appealing a Costs Order This week on Hull on Estates, Paul Trudelle and Nadia Harasymowycz discuss Carfagnini v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 10:02 am
American Home Assurance Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 6:20 am
The question with wide-ranging implications for Louisiana operators and mineral owners in Johnson et al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:15 am
Supreme Court has granted a petition for writ of certiorari to take up Rimini Street v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:24 pm
Comprehensive Addiction Treatment Center, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:48 am
Hart In Coalition for Adequate Review v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:54 pm
If only.The correct approach was indentified by the Court of Appeal in Lownds v Home Office [2002] EWCA Cic 365:“what is required is a two-stage approach. [read post]
28 May 2017, 1:47 pm
Bretby Hall Management Company Ltd v Pratt [2017] UKUT 70 (LC) This was an appeal to the UT on various issue arising from an FTT decision. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
In Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
Carver v BAA plc [2008] EWCA Civ 412; [2008] WLR (D) 122 “Where a claimant had obtained judgment as to liability, and an award in damages of a sum exceeding an earlier payment in, a judge was empowered by CPR r 36.14(1) to adopt a broad approach when considering costs and the question whether the result was ‘more advantageous’ vis à vis a refused payment in, and he was entitled if appropriate to award costs in… [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:37 am
Champion v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:25 am
District Court for the Western District of Louisiana held that a unit operator may not recover post-production costs from an unleased mineral owner’s share of production proceeds in Allen Johnson, et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:39 am
Regina v Balshaw [2009] EWCA Crim 470; [2009] WLR (D) 102 “Where a person was convicted of an offence before the Crown Court, and was ordered to pay costs to the prosecutor, there was no principle that the order was proscribed where the costs were designed to compensate a third party. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 9:06 am
<> Supreme Court to Hear Arguments Today for Access to Clean, Low-Cost Energy - The case, FERC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Justice Stevens: Cert Denial in Klan Case Has ‘No Benefit and Significant Cost’ :: U.S. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:39 am
’ ” De Souza v. [read post]
