Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 16,690
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2015, 2:49 pm
In Thompson v Leben Home for Adults, the court stated that in the absence of such a good cause showing, the court has no discretion to entertain even a meritorious, non-prejudicial cross motion for summary judgment. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Socialist Workers Party v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 3:55 am
The new case, Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:33 pm
The ranching company also entered into a lease with the State for the abutting property that the ditch crossed. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:10 pm
Griffin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 7:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Our Watch With Tim Thompson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
It’s nothing like an instance in which one State is complaining that another State has dumped sewage into a body of water that’s crossed the border.Justice Kagan is correct that, in Mass v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:29 pm
PARAMOUNT HOMES, LLC, a MONTANA LLC, UNITED STATES SEAMLESS OF SW MONTANA, Inc., a Montana corporation, Defendants, Appellees and Cross-Appellants. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
Early last year, in State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
STATE V. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:03 am
Jorgensen to brief and argue Greenlaw v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:20 pm
Court of Appeal Reverses a Judgment Sustaining a Demurrer by Blue CrossCoast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 7:36 am
Facebook; Riggs v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
Note: David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses the President and General Counsel of the Institute for Justice, Scott Bullock, one of the nation’s foremost opponents of eminent-domain abuse. [read post]
