Search for: "DAVIS v. LITTLE"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,012
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:25 pm
The jury never saw the V-Plot video. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
Constitution.V.L. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:50 pm
” Ignoring Salmonella in meat makes little, if any, sense. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Becerra; and the Colorado baker gay-marriage case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 5:40 am
At a little over 11 by 7 feet, this cell is smaller than any I've ever inhabited. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:03 am
Yet, in Blanch v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:33 am
Security National Guaranty v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 8:11 am
We see Beckett v Verlander, and then Lester v Doug Davis. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:32 pm
In Lux Traffic Controls Ltd v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 7:16 am
Davis Bus. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
And, most famously, in Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
[T]he determination under comment k that the design of a product is unavoidably unsafe and yet affords benefits outweighing its risks varies little from the determination under negligence law that the designing and marketing of the product was reasonably done. . . . [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Jennifer Davis persuasively argues that changing economic and social conditions allowed the courts, in trade mark cases, to abandon a view of consumers as heterogeneous and divided by class, education and income and instead to assume the existence of an average consumer whose perceptions were key. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:44 am
Davis, 531 U.S. 230, 241 (2001); see also Lexecon Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
Since Simpson has a little over 150 partners, the average hit to each, at least as a first approximation, will be about $50,000. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
of Texas at Austin 1.18 $106,598 $90,100 V&erbilt Univ. 1.19 $129,030 $108,800 Univ. of Arkansas 1.19 $61,500 $51,700 Mitchell Hamline Sch. of Law 1.21 $64,429 $53,200 Univ. of California-Los Angeles 1.26 $121,453 $96,600 Univ. of North Dakota 1.26 $61,500 $48,800 Univ. of Kansas 1.27 $66,415 $52,100 Univ. of Kentucky 1.28 $69,860 $54,400 Univ. of Mississippi 1.32 $64,300 $48,700 The Univ. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
