Search for: "DIVISION OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY"
Results 881 - 900
of 3,649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2021, 5:20 pm
Most site plan reviews encompass a number of public safety and water-related considerations, including reviews to determine that the site plan complies with applicable stormwater requirements. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 2:28 pm
The next day, California’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health (“Cal/OSHA”) published frequently asked questions to provide guidance to employers on compliance with the extensive requirements under the ETS. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 10:17 pm
Under the Department of Justice’s business review procedure, an organization may submit a proposed action to the Antitrust Division and receive a statement as to whether the Antitrust Division currently intends to challenge the action under the antitrust laws based on the information provided. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 1:14 pm
(This update was mandated by the Governor’s Executive Order that Cal/OSHA align with the California Department of Public Health’s updated quarantine guidance.) [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 8:11 am
The Department of Public Safety’s Division of Fire Safety (DFS) is in charge of regulating fireworks display permits. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 1:08 pm
Tammy Binford writes and edits news alerts and newsletter articles on labor and employment law topics for BLR web and print publications. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:28 pm
With coronavirus cases still surging nationwide and no additional guidance on the new exclusion pay requirements under the Division of Occupational Safety and Health’s (“Cal/OSHA”) COVID-19 emergency temporary standards (“ETS”), California employers are left wondering what paid leave laws may apply to their employees in 2021. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
The rules were dubbed “Natasha’s Law. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:29 pm
Thomas, division chief for strategy and policy at the joint C-UAS Office, for a conversation about the complex spectrum of air and missile threats. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 7:11 am
Trainers place cadets in dangerous, demoralizing, and inhumane exercises with “zero regard for the health and safety of cadets. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 7:17 am
The Muslim Justice League went on to receive a seed grant from the Harvard Law School Public Service Venture Fund in 2015. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
The relief bill was included as Division N of a larger legislative package that included government funding and other bills. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:39 pm
’s disagreement in Callow rests in large measure on a more fundamental dispute about when it is appropriate to consider Quebec civil law in the assessment of the common law, in this case, contract law. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 1:20 pm
Employers may also have reporting requirements to the state Department of Public Health under this law. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:06 pm
“Safety is our top priority. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 9:21 am
On December 14, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-84-20, addressing a number of issues in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including updating the recently implemented California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) emergency temporary standard to align with new California Department of Public Health (CDPH) guidance as it relates to quarantine guidelines. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 2:42 pm
OSHA is considering updating these standards with information gathered through an RFI and public meetings. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:11 am
Sources: https://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/division/traffic/safety/sober-safe/intoxication.html https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.49.htm https://www.dps.texas.gov/DriverLicense/alr.htmRead More [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
