Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES" Results 881 - 900 of 44,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
Indeed, this admonition sheds light on the Supreme Court’s unsigned order from December  in In Re United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am by David Duncan
  So, despite state court precedent, albeit from an intermediate court, holding that ABDW does not have two separate branches proved by separate elements, the First Circuit concluded that ABDW is divisible and thus does have two separate branches, with two different sets of elements. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:52 am by David Duncan
  So, despite state court precedent, albeit from an intermediate court, holding that ABDW does not have two separate branches proved by separate elements, the First Circuit concluded that ABDW is divisible and thus does have two separate branches, with two different sets of elements. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 2:06 am by Michael DelSignore
Additionally, the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article Twelve of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights guarantees a defendant’s right to confront a witness at trial. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:26 am
According to this Appeals Chamber decision in the case of Prosecutor v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:48 am
It does not afford the protection of statutory law (like Senator Specter's bill, the Attorney-Client Privilege Protection Act of 2006) or decisional law (like United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:12 am by Radhi Shah (USC Gould School of Law)
28 U.S.C § 1498 (a) (Governmental Use) The United States (U.S.) does not have any provisions for a compulsory license. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:17 pm by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Labor RLA; preemption The Railway Labor Act does not completely preempt retaliatory-discharge claims under state law. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Does a state have to repeal or invalidate its murder prohibition if the homicide rate declines? [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm by Berry Law Firm
Wilkie case was heard at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by a full panel of judges (en banc) and that means it has precedential effect (it can be used as law and binding on future issues). [read post]