Search for: "District of Columbia v. Little" Results 881 - 900 of 1,117
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 10:25 am by Tomassi Law Associates
The attorneys general in all 50 states and the District of Columbia charged that NCC was using improper collection tactics and making inaccurate reports to credit-reporting agencies. [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
When the Supreme Court decided, in the 2008 case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:54 pm by Eric
The guidelines are very similar to Colorado's Tattered Cover balancing test (Tattered Cover v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 [T]he determination under comment k that the design of a product is unavoidably unsafe and yet affords benefits outweighing its risks varies little from the determination under negligence law that the designing and marketing of the product was reasonably done. . . . [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:00 am by Kara OBrien
District Court for the District of Columbia, the employees made use of a local travel agency to pay for government officials’ travel that (1) had not been approved; (2) included unapproved sightseeing itineraries or other deviations from  approved travel; (3) had little or no business content; and (4) involved per diem and improper gifts. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
District Court for the District of Columbia granted a preliminary injunction to allow e-cigarette distributors to continue to import their products into the country. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:55 am by hjmarcus
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (D.C. 3-18-2011): District recommended ESY services, but failed to arrange transportation until the program was nearly over. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  The disability had been based on a 1991 misdemeanor marijuana conviction, and the court ruled that disqualifying the defendant from owning a gun on that basis violated his Second Amendment right to bear arms for self-defense, under the Supreme Court decisions in District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:48 am by Russ Bensing
  Typical is the 9th District’s decision three years ago in State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
Medical marijuana being grown in the U.S. has done little to slow the appetite for Mexican marijuana, according to a report in the San Francisco Chronicle. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  As far as I am aware, there has been very little research in this area and it is difficult to know how serious a practical problem there is. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:40 pm by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) The recent District of Columbia federal trial court decision upholding the individual mandate breaks little new ground and has many of the same weaknesses as the two previous district court decisions that went the same way. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Andrea Matwyshyn: Columbia Business School research shows people projecting their own characteristics/sophistication onto brands and vice versa. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:13 am by Jon Tracy
District Court in the District of Columbia and stay pending cases. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
Gordon from Columbia Law School – to address our core allegations and concerns. ? [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:18 pm by Lawrence Solum
City of Chicago, punctured the conventional wisdom after District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm by Sheppard Mullin
 Currently, twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia have general and/or health care FCA statutes with qui tam provisions, and another six have FCA statutes without qui tam provisions. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
  In a sense, that’s not terribly surprising, since Judge David Hamilton had previously taken the same track (if less explicitly) in his previous opinion while still on a district court judge in Hofts v. [read post]