Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General"
Results 881 - 900
of 20,991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2013, 4:36 pm
Justice Premo explained that, similar to the Ralphs appellate court’s holding that FAA preemption would essentially nullify the benefits of PAGA, “[i]n the present case, the EDRP does not explicitly prohibit private attorney general actions but it does prohibit representative actions. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:04 pm
The word “attorney,” in this context does not mean a lawyer, but rather the person appointed in the power of attorney. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:50 am
In September, the Florida Attorney General asked the Court to review the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling in NetChoice, L.L.C., v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:21 am
“The traditional, general rule has been that the attorney is liable only to his client, not to third persons. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
Now up here on the official DOJ website is the "Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder Regarding United States V. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
Now up here on the official DOJ website is the "Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder Regarding United States V. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
Diversity v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:00 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:15 am
Gibson, Attorney People generally assume that because someone is a lawyer, they must know about every area of law. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 5:48 am
In Arista v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 5:07 pm
” City of Burlington v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 12:03 pm
[And this lawsuit faces many of the same administrative law hurdles as does AHM v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 12:40 pm
While they are not strictly related to the UCL, they do sound very interesting, especially the second one, which addresses attorneys' fees under the private attorney general doctrine of Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5: ROSS (GARY) v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 2:14 pm
Feb. 2, 2021) (“Magana”) (slip op. available here), highlights a notable concern when bringing an action under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:21 am
Does there have to be consideration from the attorney to the parties? [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 3:24 pm
What does this mean? [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 3:24 pm
What does this mean? [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 5:10 pm
In Casella v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:56 pm
For that reason it is necessarily exploratory; and the rule that the examiner must indicate the purpose of his inquiry does not, in general, apply. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
Coalition for a Sustainable Future In Yucaipa v. [read post]
