Search for: "Doe v. Doe Governmental Entity"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2015, 12:09 pm
” The Religious Freedom Restoration Act: “[The federal g]overnment may substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion only if it demonstrates that application of the burden to the person (1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
David Fontaine is Executive Vice President, Chief Legal & Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary of Altegrity, a privately held company that among other entities, owns Kroll’s data breach response services. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 9:08 am
In the case, Beals v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
In 2000, in Chen v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
The Raisin Administrative Committee, a governmental entity, acquires title to the raisins and decides, in its discretion, how to dispose of them. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 2:35 pm
The “First Amendment protects against the Government; it does not leave us at the mercy of noblesse oblige. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 3:58 am
In Parrott v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
") According to the preamble, this definition "includes for-profit entities that are controlled and operated by individual owners who are likely to have associational ties, are personally identified with the entity, and can be regarded as conducting personal business affairs through the entity"--the very types of closely held for-profit entities contemplated by the Supreme Court's decision in Hobby Lobby. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:25 am
Right to Life, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
In the Term that concluded last month, Horne v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:58 am
Soon thereafter, the casino filed suit for injunctive and declaratory relief against the unions and various governmental entities. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 8:15 pm
The attorney for the defendant avers the plaintiff's cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress must be dismissed because public policy bars such a claim against a governmental entity like the defendant. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:38 pm
After then considering the fact that in Smith v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Co., 410 S.W.3d 843 (Tex. 2012) involved stop loss coverage provided to qualified, self-funded employee benefit plans sponsored by various governmental and private entities. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
In particular, the Court recognized that the “pervasive” use of disparate impact “would almost inexorably lead governmental or private entities to use ‘numerical quotas,’” that is the consideration of such factors as race, in housing-related decisions. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:17 pm
See Wooley v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:57 am
KDOL essentially reiterates its sovereign immunity defenses by arguing that governmental entities do not have the capacity to be sued in the absence of express authorization. [read post]
