Search for: "Doe v. United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 39,450
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 9:46 am
The FSIA is the federal law that protects foreign states from lawsuits, and makes foreign sovereign property located in the United States immune from attachment.The plaintiffs argued that Section 1610 of the FSIA makes a "commercial activity" exception by declaring that “[a] foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts … in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue and that property … is… [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
Though this requirement does not apply to Crown employees, the USA does not qualify as a Crown employer. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:58 am
This past week, the Sixth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the United States District Court in the case of Sun Life Assurance Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:30 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Appellant was returned to the United States in custody and, although previously had been voluntarily in the United States, he was not "found in" the US at that point. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 8:59 pm
Indeed, he would resign on August 9, just over two weeks after United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:44 pm
Winchester (NY 1852): Establishing a General Duty for Manufacturers So, while there is no uniform product liability law in the United States, product liability laws across the USA are by and large similar, with experts largely agreeing that the foundational case for product liability law is Thomas v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:36 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 11:29 pm
Luke’s Episcopal Hosp., 252 F.3d 749 (5th Cir. 2001), ruled that the False Claims Act does not violate the Constitution’s Appointment’s Clause, because “qui tam relators are not officers of the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2024, 5:45 am
In the 2001 case of Medina v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:01 am
The United States Supreme Court, in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:01 am
The United States Supreme Court, in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:01 am
The United States Supreme Court, in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm
Zeran’: The Cyberlibertarian Hack of §230 Has Run Its Course“ by Olivier Sylvain “CDA 230 Then and Now: Does Intermediary Immunity Keep the Rest of Us Healthy? [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:55 pm
United States, the Eleventh Circuit upheld Florida's cap on non-economic medical malpractice damages, ruling that the statute under which it was enacted does not violate the U.S Constitution. [read post]
