Search for: "Doe v. United States" Results 881 - 900 of 44,053
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
United States) or whether an issue lacks "judicially discoverable and manageable standards" to apply as law (such as political gerrymandering claims, as in Rucho v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  This does not include charges filed with state or local Fair Employment Practices Agencies. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  Colorado isn’t even trying to prevent Colorado’s presidential electors from casting their electoral votes for Donald Trump if he wins the popular vote in Colorado in November, nor (as I’ve explained earlier) has it asserted any state law authority to exclude Trump from the Colorado general election ballot (something that Colorado law does not appear to authorize). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle
His brief indicates that the lawyer believes Trump’s strongest argument is that Section 3 does not apply to the former president because a president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
§2383, which covers participation in rebellion or insurrection, and which provides that those found guilty "shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
  Reed then explicitly rejects the Lederman view, in a discussion which concludes:   The United States is a constitutional democracy. [read post]