Search for: "Does 1 Through 35"
Results 881 - 900
of 4,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2018, 2:24 pm
In the proposed rule, SBA says that “independent contractors who receive compensation through Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 1099 generally are not considered employees, as long as such individuals are not considered to be employees for size purposes under SBA’s Size Policy Statement No. 1. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
Separation Of Powers – Who Does What In The US Government II. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 11:01 am
As the test mentioned in point 2.1.3 above is fulfilled, not specifying the material of the tubular element 32 in claim 1 does not offend against A 123(2). [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:48 am
For a plaintiff to defeat a factual attack, he must submit facts through some evidentiary method to prove the existence of subject-matter jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 3:07 pm
The way working people in the music business participate in these things is through current royalties. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:54 am
Reich[1] and Prof. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:13 am
On November 13, 2020, from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm
SCR 60.04(4) does not apply. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:38 pm
The FDA, however, turned to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to evaluate the 510(k) process and answer two essential questions: (1) Does the 510(k) process protect patients and promote innovations? [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Virginia Bar (1964) 377 U.S. 1; cf. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:32 pm
” The NYDFS received responses from 35 of those 48 businesses. [read post]
12 Jun 2006, 4:54 am
I now turn to the application of the right of access to a court to the political question doctrine, having set out the basic points about the right in Part 1 of this sequence of posts. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
The Court stated that although the failure to inform a defendant of the proper minimum and maximum sentences that can be imposed is not a jurisdictional defect, such a failure does raise a question of the voluntariness of a guilty plea based on that misinformation. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 2:14 pm
The examiner initially rejected claims 1 as ineligible (then listed as claim 21). [read post]
6 May 2009, 3:50 am
I gave up golf years ago out of frustration: I simply could not get through the windmill! [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:55 am
Table 1. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 2:06 pm
Chavez, 133 Cal.App.4th 1350, 35 Cal.Rptr.3d 514 (Cal.App. 2 Dist.,2005). [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:30 am
Petitioner Homeland Housewares argued that claims 1 through 16 (i.e., all of the claims of the ‘688 patent) were invalid as anticipated subject matter under pre-America Invents Act (AIA) 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 7:30 am
Petitioner Homeland Housewares argued that claims 1 through 16 (i.e., all of the claims of the ‘688 patent) were invalid as anticipated subject matter under pre-America Invents Act (AIA) 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 11:03 am
The Act, however, does make clear that rules governing the new notices will be similar to the notice rules contained in the ARRA. [read post]
