Search for: "Downing v. Municipal Court"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2024, 11:05 am
Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Batson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
The SCOTUS shot that argument down too, but on technical grounds. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:30 am
Given the Court’s recent decsion to uphold Section 5 in North Austin Municipal District, this gamble only makes sense in light of the demonstrated willingness of the Roberts’ court to strike down even recently affirmed precedent (Citizens’ United reversal Austin and McConnell) and to reach issues that are not squarely presented in a case in order to narrow the protections of laws the conservative majority disfavors (e.g., elevating the bar for… [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
Bd of Educ of Tularosa Municip Schs 52 IDELR 229 (D.NM 2/24/9) SEA denied FAPE to student but parents not prevailing party; Emma L v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
As this Court noted Fretwell v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
At Understanding the ADA, William Goren notes that the court’s opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:27 pm
United States, in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not commandeer state officials to enforce federal law. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
Franita Tolson – In NAMUDNO v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:28 am
Marcia Dempe, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
The Texas Supreme Court considered both of these questions this week in the case of Powell v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
As a result of that, and some litigation in the Massachusetts state courts, it seems that the only U.S. residents who have been allowed to marry in Massachusetts are Rhode Islanders (based on a possibly dubious interpretation of Rhode Island law by the Massachusetts courts) and a few New Yorkers who rushed in to marry in 2004 before state government threats to local clerks shut down that process. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 1:19 am
Municipal Land Use Law does not give them that power, the state Supreme Court held Thursday. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:13 pm
X is for the X on online ballots, which were used in several municipal elections in 2010. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
In NAACP v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:54 am
In NAACP v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:00 am
In 2016, it was reported that CONY was shutting down and would not be participating in the Mayor's 2017 reelection campaign as it had achieved its goals, advocating for the Mayor's policy agenda. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing in McBurney v. [read post]
