Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 881 - 900 of 3,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2022, 7:02 pm by Richard Hunt
” Plaintiffs state that they live near their respective Defendants’ stores and have been customers “on prior occasions. [read post]
The decision letter stated: “As you are aware Westminster is currently suffering from a severe shortage of both temporary and permanent accommodation. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:39 am by Rose Hughes
Particularly, the agreement between GW and Otsuka stated that it was governed by New York Law. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021… [read post]
3 May 2014, 6:30 am by Jon Gelman
”On April 24, the patient traveled by plane from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia to London, England then from London to Chicago, Illinois. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 9:28 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issued its eagerly awaited ruling in Ehrenfeld v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:01 am by Laura
In OG v AG [2020] the court has gone further to state that conduct should be taken into account, not just where it is unjust, but also where the impact is financially measurable. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:57 am by CMS
The law has been clearly and firmly stated: the exercise of state power trumps private law rights, in these particular circumstances. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:00 am
Begin in England: Information was owned, its ownership assigned by the sovereign, sometimes by whim or caprice. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:57 pm by Jaya Ramji-Nogales
No one knows what the Supreme Court will do in Turner v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:25 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS QC
Baroness Hale specifically alerted at [35] to the very real problem of discrimination against gay people before stating that this was not happened in the present case. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
After conducting a survey of the classifications used in the authorities including Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, Douglas v Hello! [read post]