Search for: "Edwards v. Super*"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,070
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Graham v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
V and art. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:24 pm
Edwards, 367 N.J. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
V. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:40 am
V. [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:04 am
EDWARD A. deRENZY, App. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
4 May 2010, 7:21 pm
Edwards and Mr. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Dental Ass’n, 139 F.3d 598 (1998) (en banc) (Tatel, J., dissenting) (along with Edwards, C.J., and Wald and Rogers, JJ., joining opinion arguing that intentional sex discrimination is sufficient to justify punitive damage award), rev’d, 527 U.S. 526 (1999). [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 7:17 am
Editor’s Note: Edward Greene is a partner at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP focusing on corporate law matters. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Law Lessons from JOHN EDWARD WOODS V. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 am
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Edwards (2003) 111 Cal.App.4th 436, 444, 4 Cal.Rptr.3d 54; Schild v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 8:50 am
Edwards, 367 N.J. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:58 pm
The Court also notes that in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:00 pm
Smead v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:00 pm
Smead v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:08 pm
The court denied that request, revoked the sentence of probation, and imposed the aforementioned determinate term of imprisonment and period of postrelease supervision on the ground that defendant failed to comply with the community service requirement.Citing its authority to "substitute our own discretion for that of a trial court [that] has not abused its discretion in the imposition of a sentence" (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 86; see People v… [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am
For more on this argument, see this interesting article on city v. suburban fortunes in the current recession. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:08 am
Dismissal of disciplinary charges recommended where correction officers were unable to anticipate the need for, or degree of, force requiredCorrection v Dominguz and Edward Martinez, OATH #550/10; 551/10OATH Administrative Law Judge Alessandra Zorgniotti recommended dismissal of charges brought against two New York City Department of Corrections correction officers alleging violations of various provisions of the Department's use of force directive.Where, as here, said Judge… [read post]
