Search for: "Employment and Labor Group" Results 881 - 900 of 12,996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2011, 3:55 pm by Aliza Herzberg
On September 2, 2011, a National Labor Relations Board Administrative Law Judge declared that a Buffalo, New York not-for-profit employer violated the National Labor Relations Act when it discharged a group of employees who engaged in a Facebook discussion in which they criticized their supervisor and complained about poor working conditions. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 5:19 pm by Anthony Zaller
This video contains few portions of a presentation I conducted for a group of California employers covering new hiring laws facing California employers in 2018, including: AB 168 (Labor Code section 432.3) effective January 1, 2018 bans employers from asking about prior salary history. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 5:57 am by John F. Fullerton III
It is important for financial services employers to remember that the National Labor Relations Act protects their employees even when those employees are non-union, and that when groups of employees engage in discussions about their terms and conditions of employment via the employer’s email system, that conduct may constitute protected activity for which the employees may not be punished. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
  WORK COMP CALCULATOR:   http://www.LowerWC.com/calculator.php MODIFIED DUTY CALCULATOR:   http://www.LowerWC.com/transitional-duty-cost-calculator.php WC GROUP:  http://www.linkedin.com/groups? [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 5:30 am by Kori Shafer-Stack
  WORK COMP CALCULATOR:   http://www.LowerWC.com/calculator.php MODIFIED DUTY CALCULATOR:   http://www.LowerWC.com/transitional-duty-cost-calculator.php WC GROUP:  http://www.linkedin.com/groups? [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers sponsoring group health plan coverage now or in 2014, check the adequacy of your insurer or third party administrator’s claims and appeals processes and notices. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 3:45 pm by The Erlich Law Office, PLLC
  Many groups are expected to challenge the rule once it is enacted in 2014. [read post]
2 May 2022, 8:46 am by Zak Gowen
”  Of course, the district court’s holding that collusive agreements between employers should be treated as per se illegal gives the government additional ammunition to try future cases. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 2:41 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  Rebeca is an associate at Godfrey & Kahn in Milwaukee, where she is a member of the Labor, Employment & Immigration Law Practice Group. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 11:58 am by Michael Wahlander
AB 465 would have banned mandatory agreements to arbitrate Labor Code claims as a condition of employment. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:56 am by Amy Howe
In fact, the arbitrators contend, prohibiting group challenges could result in duplicative individual claims that would create “a procedural morass” and a burden on the employers. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 8:33 pm by JP Sarmiento
CASE: I-140 (EB-2)    EMPLOYER: Dental Group in Toledo, OHBENEFICIARY: Egyptian Periodontist Our client is from Egypt, who is currently working in the United States as an associate periodontist on his H-1B. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 2:59 am by Robin Shea
Department of Labor’s Persuader Rule and what that will mean for employers. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:05 am by Roy Ginsburg
  In each of my sessions, my panelists invariably received questions about social media -- what was permissible employer conduct, what employee actions could be curtailed, what employer conduct violates the National Labor Relations Act, etc. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:20 am by Kara M. Maciel
By:  Paul Rosenberg As described in our blog on January 5, 2012, the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) new rules governing union elections introduce a host of changes which will place employers at a disadvantage. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
” If you are dealing with a dispute with an employer in New Jersey or New York, the employment attorneys at the Resnick Law Group are available to answer your questions and discuss your rights and options. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 10:08 am by Mark Theodore
 Nevertheless, the ALJ ruled the first prong was met because the employee was seeking group action because the tweets “did not pertain to wholly personal issues relevant only to [the employee] but were truly group complaints. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 8:31 am by Mia Valenzuela
Maribel joins RPLG with extensive experience in labor and employment law. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 8:02 am by Meena Harris
  Where, as here, the purpose of employee communications is to seek and provide mutual support looking toward group action to encourage the employer to address problems in terms or conditions of employment, not to disparage its product or services or undermine its reputation, the communications are protected. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  The MOU helps the IRS investigate if employers the Labor Department has found in violation of federal labor laws have paid the proper employment taxes. [read post]