Search for: "Evans v State"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
Loving v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
The Portugese Court had not been able to put the interests of the property owners and the tenant in the balance, the absolute terms of the law after the 20 year period were not per se incompatible with the Convention (Evans v UK [GC] App No 6339/05 at para 89, Salabaiku v France App No 10519/83 at para 28). [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
The Portugese Court had not been able to put the interests of the property owners and the tenant in the balance, the absolute terms of the law after the 20 year period were not per se incompatible with the Convention (Evans v UK [GC] App No 6339/05 at para 89, Salabaiku v France App No 10519/83 at para 28). [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:49 am
In Evans v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:33 pm
In Byrne v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:49 am
Part IV presents the proposed title eligibility model and applies it to patents describing functionally claimed results at issue in the Supreme Court’s decisions in Evans v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:12 pm
In Roper v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 7:14 am
Evans v. [read post]
25 Jul 2006, 7:44 pm
Almeida v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:12 am
In a Mississippi case, State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:51 pm
Patchak (standing to sue) on August 25, 2011 and Evans v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am
Security Pacific National Bank v Evans, 31 AD3d at 279.) [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
For USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:16 am
Evan S. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:16 am
Evan S. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
To the extent that third-party plaintiffs’ submission of extrinsic evidence purporting to support a direct claim of legal malpractice could have been construed by the court as a request for leave to amend their third-party complaint, such a request was properly denied because third-party plaintiffs’ new claim is patently lacking in merit (see Broyles v Town of Evans, 147 AD3d 1496, 1497 [4th Dept 2017]). [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 5:15 am
[Romer v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
