Search for: "Ex Parte United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 5,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
The chief prosecutor in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 7:40 am
One possible exception occurred in 1789, when Hamilton obtained loans on his own authority to "meet expenses incurred at the beginning of the present government of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2008, 10:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 8:05 am
[n. 11]n.11: See Ex. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
Importantly, today’s ruling does not impact NanoString’s legal ability to market or sell CosMx SMI products for protein detection in the European Union, nor does it impact the lawful selling of any NanoString CosMx SMI products in the United States, the United Kingdom or the rest of the world outside of the EU member states participating in the UPC system. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:29 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
In addition, the bill provides that state attorneys general also may bring a civil suit in their state to enforce provisions of this bill or regulations issued by the agency. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Ex parte TRO equivalent; then an inter partes proceeding, at which injunctive relief is refused. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm
Some states in the United States have implemented laws to address school bullying. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
The New York Times reported here about a “new and perilous period” in the United States’ battle against illicit drugs and addiction. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:51 pm
" So says the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as do the bills of rights of many state constitutions. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
I am pleased to be part of the 2023 conference on SEC Regulation Outside the United States to deliver the Fifth Annual Scott Friestad Memorial Lecture. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 2:41 pm
" "Any attempts by foreign governments to hijack free speech—in social media or any form—will not be tolerated here in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 6:10 am
” Id. at 550 (emphasis added) (citing United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 5:42 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:52 am
No, said the Alabama intermediate appellate court last year (though apparently without a published majority opinion), and last Friday the Alabama Supreme Court declined to hear the case, also without a published opinion, in Ex Parte Rodriguez. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
from Ex parte ChalmerWe agree with the Appellants that the Examiner’s rejections are notwell founded.Bayless describes biologically-based gas cleaning systems forreducing emissions from fossil burning units (i.e., removing carbon containingcompounds from a flowing gas stream). [read post]
