Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 881 - 900 of 30,462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2024, 4:11 am by SHG
Without reading the complaint itself, it’s hard to determine whether Northern District of Florida Judge Kent Wetherell was being fair or harsh with pro se plaintiff lawyer Allan Kassenoff. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
On a motion by President Shrum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma dismissed the suit for lack of standing, ruling that the United States Supreme Court in Summers v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
I think that Sotomayor drew a fair implication from the brief, but it was never stated expressly. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Farm The Maryland Court of Appeals answered this question incorrectly in Stickley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  … (8) The common law defence of fair comment is abolished and, accordingly, section 6 of the Defamation Act 1952 (fair comment) is repealed. [read post]
In 2024,  the division bench comprising Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, delivered a significant judgment in the case of Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Meredith R. Miller and Laura Dooley
  It also requires consideration of the conventional wisdom about who benefits from litigating in federal court and how that informs litigation strategy, as well as very recent legislative initiatives aimed at unveiling the beneficial owners of LLCs.Federal v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
These include the following, among other indicators: (i) the acquirer is “well-capitalized” and the resulting institution will be “well-capitalized”; (ii) the acquirer has a Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory; (iii) the resulting institution will have total assets of less than $50 billion; (iv) the acquirer has composite, management and consumer compliance ratings of 1 or 2; and (v) the acquirer has… [read post]