Search for: "Fisher v. District Court"
Results 881 - 900
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2007, 3:08 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:09 am
That is because the Apprendi majority has continued -- both in this Term's decision in Cunningham v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
The district court found it was not and the 9th affirmed (Tashima & Bea). [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 6:12 am
The district court was appalled at the police conduct, and suppressed. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:50 am
LEXIS 38146 (ED WI, May 24, 2007), a Wisconsin federal district court reaffirmed its prior determination in the case that "substantial burden" under RLUIPA as one that makes religious exercise effectively impractiable.In Fisher v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 8:13 am
Fisher-Price, Inc. and Mattel, Inc. and Perfect 10 v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 12:32 pm
Cyrus Elahi in Paris, and his brother subsequently got a default judgment against Iran in federal district court in D.C. for $311.7 million. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:29 am
We have no basis to disagree with the district court's conclusion. [read post]
29 May 2007, 3:00 pm
District Court. [read post]
17 May 2007, 3:01 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKBanking FDIC Cannot Transfer $90 Million Interpleader Action to Federal Court in District of Columbia Bank of New York v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 3:43 am
This posting covers the sole patent case that was appealed from the district court level and decided by the Federal Circuit during the 19th calendar week of 2007. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:39 am
The district court dismissed. [read post]
9 May 2007, 12:04 pm
Obviousness found by district court affirmed by CAFC, with due citation to KSR v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 12:00 pm
Fisher-Price & Mattel, the appeals court upholds a district court ruling of obviousness (CAFC 06-1402). [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:55 am
Fisher-Price, Inc., No. 06-1402, Slip Op. [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:47 am
In their first true application of the Supreme Court's obviousness pronouncement in KSR v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 11:25 am
Fisher-Price, Inc., et al. (06-1402) May 9, 2007Leapfrog appealed the district court's (pre-KSR) finding that claim 25 from US Patent 5,813,861 was invalid:Claim 25. [read post]
9 May 2007, 9:46 am
For the first time since the Supreme Court handed down KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:10 am
Jarvis v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 7:38 am
" Fisher v. [read post]
