Search for: "France v. United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
And yet the United States is still at war more than two decades later. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
” [via LexisOne] FAVORABLE TO THE PROSECUTION OR EXECUTIONER United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 3:23 pm
See Midwest Plastic Fabricators, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2025, 11:32 pm
It will be hosted by Frances Godden, Senior Associate in Stone King’s charities team, and she will be joined by Alan Baldwin, CEO of United Outcomes. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 8:13 pm
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [5, 9, 13, 31] According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine, The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but… [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 4:55 am
Obviously, the United States is not currently at war with any country—including Venezuela. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:02 pm
Frances B. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:48 am
Friedman v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
IPKat has produced a book review of Intellectual Property Protection for AI-Generated Creations: Europe, United States, Australia and Japan, by Ana Ramalho, Copyright Counsel at Google, and a Guest Lecturer at Leiden University. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:57 am
Goodyear v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:20 am
Recall that Section 5 provided as follows: "No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil action or proceeding to which the United States, or a current or former officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other agent of the United States is a party as a source of rights in any court of the United States or its States or territories. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:54 am
Recall that Section 5 provided as follows: "No person may invoke the Geneva Conventions or any protocols thereto in any habeas corpus or other civil action or proceeding to which the United States, or a current or former officer, employee, member of the Armed Forces, or other agent of the United States is a party as a source of rights in any court of the United States or its States or territories. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
The claimant, who formerly worked as a recruitment consultant for the defendant’s agency, sued the defendant for an email she sent to her new employer, stating that she was in breach of her contract by contacting her old clients. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
The book argues that the binary state-versus-federal-government model that is today taken to be the essence of American federalism does not correspond to the legal or political reality of the United States in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
Lenovo (United States), Inc. et al. [read post]
