Search for: "Gay v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 3,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 7:05 am
That trend has snowballed since 2013, when the Supreme Court struck down the core of the Defense of Marriage Act in the ACLU’s United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 11:14 am
Texas and Romer v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 7:55 am
Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995) and Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 6:36 am
The Second Circuit has once again declined to rule that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, ruling that it cannot overrule a Second Circuit ruling from 2000 that said "sex discrimination" does not extend to gays and lesbians.The case is Zarda v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
See IMS Health Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:30 pm
Perry, which examines whether the State of California violated the Due Process clause when voters enacted a law that prohibited Gay Marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
The Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 8:09 am
Kennedy, is John Doe, et al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:46 pm
For gays that would indeed mean exercising the caution that hundreds of millions of gay people across the world do in practice have to exercise. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 8:15 am
Braff, an openly-gay S&C partner, as "of counsel" on the S&C v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:44 am
Olson and David Boies, who represented opposing sides in the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:25 am
Baroness Hale specifically alerted at [35] to the very real problem of discrimination against gay people before stating that this was not happened in the present case. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:30 pm
Texas, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 7:23 am
NYCERS v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:14 pm
The petitioners in that case, Elane Photography v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:46 am
Vermont was also the first state to allow civil unions for gay couples in 1999. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm
Stone v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:21 am
" Professor Mortenson asserted that the couple was properly married following Judge Friedman's ruling and that status cannot be undone, even if the SCOTUS reinstates Michigan's constitutional ban on gay marriage.Ever since the 5-4 SCOTUS ruling in United States v Windsor in 2012, same-sex marriage advocates and the ACLU have argued in lower courts across the nation that the case applies to states' power to ban same-sex marriage; the… [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:54 pm
Tenn.) in B.A.P. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 3:15 am
United States v. [read post]
