Search for: "Golden v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
Waters v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 8:19 am
State, and Hepp v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 10:29 am
The Golden State prohibited state-funded travel to Texas, and other states that adopted certain LGBT polices. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:46 am
In a recent California Court of Appeal decision, Lemaire v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
Bimont v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 4:00 am
Alexander, et al v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
In Ohio State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 9:15 am
2022cv1564-24 [9] Feist Publications, Inc., v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:28 am
Guevarra v. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:34 am
Manning v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:17 am
I can’t recall the last time a case as mundane as O’Connor v. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 10:31 am
Clinton/Gore (v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 1:41 pm
I should not, I suppose, get too excited about what is little more than a marketing puff (Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1892] EWCA Civ 1) - an attention-grabbing but legally dubious proposition. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:57 am
In Dediol v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:18 pm
The case, Doe I v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 1:47 am
The United States Supreme Court pointed out in Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 7:24 am
The state high court’s ruling in Troester v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am
However, after the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Rubin v Eurofinance SA, that golden thread seems to have lost its lustre. [read post]
