Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 61,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2022, 4:19 am
The invention for which the patent was granted was a “Method and apparatus for controlling [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 5:37 am by Irina Tarsis
This year, the Supreme Court of the United States may (or may not) grant a writ to hear a case involving Nazi-era looted art for the first time in almost a decade. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
On December 11, 2019, the California Supreme Court by a 7-0 vote granted the petition for review of Butte and Plumas Counties and the Plumas County Flood Control and Water Conservation District in County of Butte v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:41 am by tracey
Regina (SG ( Iraq)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Regina (OR ( Iraq)) Same: [2012] EWCA Civ 940;  [2012] WLR (D)  207 “A claimant affected by, but not party to, a country guidance determination which was under appeal to the Court of Appeal was not entitled to an automatic stay of removal pending the outcome of the appeal. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 2:53 am
I had petition for review granted by the KSC in State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 11:33 am by Steven Cohen
 The motions to exclude were denied in part and granted in part Facts: This antitrust case (Gumwood HP Shopping Partners LP v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:54 pm
The State of Hawaii filed its merits brief in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:45 am
Does 1-16, the case targeting students at the State University of New York in Albany, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has granted an interim stay of the subpoena calling for the identity of student "John Doe #3". [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:38 am by Lyle Denniston
  That is the issue the Court granted in Hall v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:29 am
The State moved to dismiss, and the trial court granted the motion.On appeal, the Court of Appeals noted that there was "no factual allegation as to the basis for the knowledge attributed to the State or that related why the State should have been aware of any deviant tendencies that [the perpetrator] may have had, or even that he, in fact, had such tendencies prior to the alleged incidents that occurred with the [plaintiff]. [read post]