Search for: "Grant v. United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 28,582
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
BYLT Performance LLC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
Smyth v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
[I will blog the NetChoice v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
In Campbell v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
According to plaintiffs, the LESMC "denounces capitalism, the nuclear family, and the territorial integrity of the lower 48 states of the United States[,]" and is designed "to expunge the idea of Zionism, and the legitimacy of the existence of the State of Israel, from the public square[.] [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
And yet the United States is still at war more than two decades later. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 9:48 am
Susan V. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 9:50 am
Mcelligott v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
August 25, 2023 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in FTC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
In County of Grayson v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
No matter how much authority over all the parameters of railroad competition the ICC was granted—and such authority was considerable[2]—the system of railroad regulation proved susceptible to industry capture and political influence. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:38 pm
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California just denied in part--and in economic terms, almost completely--a U.S. antitrust class action brought on behalf of leading French publishers such as Le Figaro and L'Équipe (about that one, see my personal note toward the end). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:54 pm
United States, 161 Fed. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 8:23 am
Aug. 1, 2023) (Africk). [2] Citing the Fontenot v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
" Not enough states ratified before the seven years elapsed, or even before the end of a three-year extension that Congress tried to grant by simple majority in 1978. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:10 pm
The Court’s analysis was guided by cases such as Goleta Union School District v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:36 pm
And while the court recognized the First Amendment rights of noncitizens currently present in the United States who limit their online speech because they may need to renew a visa in the future, it held that the federal government’s regulation of immigration should be granted significant deference. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 12:39 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 10:34 am
The Court’s decision stems from a case involving Gerald Groff, an Evangelical Christian former United State Postal Service (USPS) worker. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:59 pm
That provision states: “A United States citizen 18 years of age and resident in this State may vote. [read post]