Search for: "Gray v. HAS" Results 881 - 900 of 1,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2022, 4:52 am by Charles Sartain
  * Carolina has recently survived her second year at SMU Law School and is a Gray Reed summer associate. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 3:05 am by Brent Lorentz
 Over the past several years, the Supreme Court has started to reclaim some of this ground. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Dallas lawyer Cleve Clinton of Gray Reed & McGraw on the firm’s blog, Tilting The Scale Should Drivers Get One Free Swerve? [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:23 pm by Simon Gibbs
  As before, the t-shirts have our brand new Legal Costs Blog logo on the rear and one of the following slogans on the front: "Actually, I think you'll find it was Lord Scott who gave the dissenting judgment in Callery v Gray" "The Legal Costs Blog is very educational. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:45 pm by Colin O'Keefe
It has to include decision-makers and others who affect the day-to-day actions of the company. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 10:31 am by John McFarland
The suit, Mesa Water, L.P. and G&J Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Jurisdiction is not acquired pursuant to CPLR 308(2) unless both the delivery and mailing requirements have been strictly complied with'” (Josephs v AACT Fast Collections Services., Inc., 155 AD3d 1010, 1012, quoting Gray-Joseph v Shuhai Liu, 90 AD3d 988, 989; accord Munoz v Reyes, 40 AD3d 1059, 1059; Ludmer v Hasan, 33 AD3d 594, 594). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Lina Jasinskaite
Gray has the longest tenure of any director; he has served on the board of JP Morgan Chase or its predecessor institution (JPMorgan Chase merged with Bank One in 2004) since 1992. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 9:29 am by Peter Hirtle
  Kenny Crews has a useful post on how its implications may not be terrible for libraries. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm by Robert Cottrol - Guest
Both opinions, like Justice Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]