Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 5:29 am
Starting on Monday 2 July 2012 in the Supreme Court is the two day appeal of Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and anor v Yunus Rahmatullah in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips, L Hale, L Kerr, L Dyson, L Wilson, L Reed, L Carnwath). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am
The appeal was heard by a five justice panel of Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Kerr, Clarke and Reed. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 2:59 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
On 14 March 2012, the Supreme Court handed down their long-awaited judgment in the case of AB v Ministry of Defence, the much publicised case of the former British servicemen seeking compensation from the British government following alleged exposure to radiation nuclear testing that took place in the Pacific region from 1952 to 1958. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
On 14 March 2012, the Supreme Court handed down their long-awaited judgment in the case of AB v Ministry of Defence, the much publicised case of the former British servicemen seeking compensation from the British government following alleged exposure to radiation nuclear testing that took place in the Pacific region from 1952 to 1958. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 5:24 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
Second, a Camp Pendleton Marine, 25-year-old Jared Hale, was charged with three counts of Vehicular manslaughter after he drove his vehicle into a tree in Dana Point on February 14th, killing three other Camp Pendleton Marines that were also in the car. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
The view of the minority (Lady Hale, Lord Mance) The minority reasoned from a different starting point. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:20 pm
If France v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:42 am
In particular, in paragraphs 16 and 17 of the judgments of Lord Walker and Baroness Hale in Jones v Kernott they said:16. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:54 am
The Supreme Court held by a majority of 5 to 2 (L Hale and L Mance dissenting) that an EAW issued by a public prosecutor is a valid Pt 1 Warrant issued by a judicial authority within the meaning of ss 2(2) and 66 of the 2003 Act. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am
Lady Hale’s dissenting judgment envisioned a wider discretion. [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:33 am
Sitting in the Supreme Court from Monday 28 May 2012 until Tuesday 29 May 2012 is the appeal of SerVaas Incorporated v Rafidian Bank & ors, heard by Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Clarke, Sumption, and Reed. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:34 am
Lady Hale gives a separate concurring judgment. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:01 am
People v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
Starting on Monday 21 May 2012 in the Privy Council is the appeal of ANS & anor v ML, listed for two days in front of a panel of five (L Hope, L Hale, L Wilson, L Reed, L Carnwath). [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
He also points out Lady Hale’s parting shot: that it would be better if the judges were given back their ability to micromanage CTC in these situations (impossible while the statute exists), though Gardner himself doubts whether this would be better in practice. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm
Lady Hale gave the example of “household tasks which an old person ….can only perform with great difficulty”. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am
Lady Hale reviewed the authorities at domestic and CJEU level (the latter consisting of no fewer than 12 cases from Mangold v Helm [2006] 1 CML 1132 to and Case C-447/09 Prigge & Ors v Deutsche Lufthansa AG [2011] IRLR 1052). [read post]
