Search for: "Harmon v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 5:21 am
The September 19, 2018 Court of Appeals opinion in Bojilov v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:47 am
., inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the sign at hand, states that:1. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am
This issue that has been debated by copyright experts over the years because, it is argued, the destruction of an artwork may or may not have a negative impact on the reputation of the artist – the test established by Article 6bis of the Berne Convention, and mirrored in most copyright laws in the world, for claiming a violation of the artist’s right of integrity (in the context of Amar Nath Sehgal v Union of India, I commented: “destruction of a work can prejudice an… [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
The 2006 amendment preempts state and federal dilution actions against federally registered marks, which also helps big TM owners. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 3:30 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:10 am
Again, this has led to different rules per EU Member States, a scenario that the Regulation will ideally resolve. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
Texas v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:34 am
Can 1376 Forest be harmonized with Budis and Pappas? [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am
Code § 5412, was not presented at trial can be found in the Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Raymond Craig Penrose v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 11:50 pm
In reaching this conclusion, it focuses on the distinction between the exercise of state power abroad and the exercise of state power regarding foreign facts. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:36 pm
There has been much litigation both in California and on the federal level concerning the enforceability of class action waivers, the most recent important decision being that of the United States Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
And it’s fully harmonized, meaning that states can’t try to “top up” the DSA. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm
How do you measure the risk of freedom of expression v. copyright takedowns? [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
LLC, 2010.KDZ3156 .H87 2010Conflict of LawsK7041 .B6 2010Unifying and harmonizing substantive law and the role of conflict of laws / Katharina Boele-Woelki.Boele-Woelki, Katharina.Leiden ; Boston : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.CongressKF4937 .O44 2011Congressional procedures and the policy process / Walter J. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:11 am
One of these cases reached the Supreme Court in 2012 in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
Government’s position for the Supreme Court’s review of Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
The following is a Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide for the State of Michigan. [read post]
