Search for: "Harris v. Department of State" Results 881 - 900 of 1,388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 1:57 pm by Steve Hall
And: The state Corrections Department purchased supplies of the lethal drugs from Cardinal Health, an Ohio-based wholesale drug supplier. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm by Law Lady
NORMAN HARRIS SERVICES, INC.; GORDON CUTHBERTSON; and ENVIROGREEN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellees. 2nd District. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:47 pm by John Elwood
The court denied review in 12-time relist Harris v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 1:49 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Circuit’s opinion in al Bahlul v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Adam Faderewski
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in May 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm by Adam Faderewski
The State Bar of Texas’ Membership Department was informed in May 2021 of the deaths of these members. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:45 am
An article authorizing the town to borrow up to $200,000 to upgrade residential septic systems to comply with state Title V regulations. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
 On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  In fact, the Department of Health and Human Services recently announced a surprisingly aggressive goal of having 85 percent of volume-based provider payments moved to value-based arrangements by 2016. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:33 am by Guest Author
Legal Standard to Establish Unlawful Discrimination The amended regulations also update the legal standard to establish unlawful discrimination to conform with the California Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]