Search for: "Hill v. California" Results 881 - 900 of 1,324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am by admin
State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668, 680-681; see also California Teachers Assn. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 3:28 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Tracing its interpretation of the § 15300.2 exception back to statements made in a 1976 California Supreme Court case, Wildlife Alive v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am by admin
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:40 am by Lisa R. Pruitt
As journalist Carlos Alcala observes, it reads something like a Declaration of Independence:We the People of the County of El Dorado, California, have the right to produce, process, sell, purchase and consume local foods, thus promoting self-reliance, the preservation of family farms and local food traditions.Indeed, "freedom v. oppression" was a theme among the 20 or so pro-ordinance speakers at the meeting. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 8:04 am by Russell Beck
And, the Western District of Pennsylvania – following a California decision – reached a similar decision in Hill v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:53 am by Staci Zaretsky
With the addition of these 12 lawsuits, the grand total of law schools facing class actions over allegedly deceptive employment data is now 15 (let’s not forget about Alaburda v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:34 am by Conor McEvily
The Court’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:33 pm by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
 The court decided to follow and apply a two-part test rendered by the California Court of Appeal in Gemini Aluminum Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 9:49 am
The Agreement states in part: 'Each party waives the provisions of California Probate Code Section 143 and California Family Code Section 1615 relating to financial disclosures. . . . [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
There have been a couple of interesting cases involving social media: a HR manager bringing a constructive dismissal case against his former employer after a dispute over his LinkedIn profile; and the ongoing PhoneDog case in California raising the question of who owns a former employee’s Twitter account. [read post]