Search for: "Hobbie v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2009, 8:20 pm
The Court cited Hobbie in applying the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause to UC hearings, and De Grego v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:39 am
The latter became a focal point of the decision in State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:59 pm
Anonymous left comments on Hobbie I and my earlier post on Sherbert v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:59 pm
Anonymous left comments on Hobbie I and my earlier post on Sherbert v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:00 am
In Hobbie v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:00 am
In Hobbie v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 3:32 pm
See, e.g., Hobbie v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 9:03 am
Having grown up in Tyler, the passing of the late, great federal Judge William Wayne Justice last week hit very close to home.For readers of this blog, Judge Justice will be best known as the jurist who virtually controlled the Texas prison system for nearly two decades in the aftermath of the infamous Ruiz v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
ROBERT SCOTT, HONORABLECOMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, THORNTON KEEL, DONNA KEEL, MICHAEL HELLRUNG, DONNA HELLRUNG, WILLIAM PASCHALL, DAVID WOMACK, NATALIE KLOSS, DARRYL HUBBELL AND AMY HUBBELL; from Travis County; 3rd district (03-07-00576-CV, 275 SW3d 558, 11-14-08, pet. denied Sep. 2009)09-0138CITY OF AUSTIN, ET AL. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 8:54 am
Hobbies: Golf, Computers. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 5:07 am
” Martinelli v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:07 pm
” Martinelli v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:31 am
In Leduc v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 6:25 am
The other woman excused herself, stating that she wanted to go shopping and inviting Bitsy along. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 8:08 pm
In Netter v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
As stated earlier, Dr. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 6:00 pm
Commissioner v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
It states that Congress found the following: (i) the Treasury Secretary does not have authority to provide exemptions or special rules to particular industries or classes of taxpayers; (ii) the Notice granting 382 relief is inconsistent with Congressional intent and the legal authority of this Notice is doubtful; but (iii) taxpayers should be allowed to rely on the Notice. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
Article II, § 2 identifies the President as the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’ and the Supreme Court has stated unequivocally that the President has the prerogative to establish rules and regulations for the armed forces. [read post]
