Search for: "Howard v. United States" Results 881 - 900 of 1,368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 10:33 am by Orin Kerr
United States, 72 F.2d 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 607, 55 S.Ct. 123, 79 L.Ed. 697 (1934); In re Eskay, 122 F.2d 819 (3d Cir.1941); Howard v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 6:45 am by Joshua Matz
At the San Jose Mercury News, Howard Mintz discusses United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm by Tomiko Brown-Nagin
United States, are consistently cited in Supreme Court opinions, in constitutional law casebooks, and at confirmation hearings as prime examples of weak constitutional analysis. .... [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am by Rosalind English
Vinter and others v United Kingdom (application nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10) – read judgment  The Strasbourg Court has found three British murderers’ imprisonment for life is not inhuman or degrading and therefore not in violation of Article 3. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am by Jay McDaniel
For United States Dept. of Justice, Interested Party: Susan Frances Knight, U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 5:50 am by Howard Knopf
It should not be an “F word”.Howard Knopf© Howard Knopf 2012Howard Knopf is Counsel to Macera & Jarzyna, LLP in Ottawa, Canada. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by Amy Howe
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rejected the agents’ argument. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm by Russell Beck
” Ninth Circuit (California): On December 15, the 9th Circuit took oral argument  in its en banc (full court) review of the controversial United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:11 am by Viking
There is an interesting case going on in the Ninth, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 6:20 am by Joshua Matz
United States, in which the state has asked the Court to review the Ninth Circuit’s decision blocking enforcement of four provisions of S.B. 1070, its controversial immigration law. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by Marissa Miller
” In an op-ed for the Denver Post, Tom Bie addresses the potential implications of PPL Montana for “anyone who likes fishing, rafting or canoeing public water in the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 11:56 am by David Lat
” With ‘Deep Regret,’ Lindsey Judge Issues Final Order [FCPA Blog] Lindsey Case Showed Value of Constitutional Protections [FCPA Blog] Judge Slams FBI, Prosecutors For Misconduct in Bribery Case [Forbes] Matz: Pretty Soon You’re Talking Misconduct [Simple Justice] United States v. [read post]