Search for: "IN RE CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Eastman’s legal analysis sets out a range of supposed options by which, during the certification of the electoral vote on Jan. 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence could disregard swing-state electors from states supporting Joe Biden and thus hand Trump a second term in office. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 3:09 pm
We’re dedicated to keeping families together and staying current with the latest developments in immigration law. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:38 pm
This last section (b) leaves a lot of questions. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:25 am
OFPA preempts state certification requirements, but doesn’t preempt broadly. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
In the 2014 case of Halliburton II, the Supreme Court re-affirmed the Basic v. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 8:03 am
AI is projected into the great societal debates in liberal democratic states (diversity, equality, gender, and rule of law, etc.) and then offered up as a threat (a device for augmentation of societal wrongs) unless appropriately domesticated. [read post]
1 May 2024, 2:26 pm
City/State: Louisville, Kentucky Position Title: Defense Litigation Paralegal/Paralegal Manager Major Duties: As a litigation paralegal, I assist one partner and several associates in representing numerous clients in healthcare law disputes. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:13 pm
City/State: Louisville, Kentucky Position Title: Defense Litigation Paralegal/Paralegal Manager Major Duties: As a litigation paralegal, I assist one partner and several associates in representing numerous clients in healthcare law disputes. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
A court clerk later entered a default certificate. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:51 pm
We're a bible college. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:49 am
Thus, the court held that “as long as the named plaintiffs have standing to sue the named defendants, any concern about whether it is proper to include out-of-state, nonparty class members with claims subject to different state laws is a question of predominance under Rule 23(b)(3), not a question of ‘adjudicatory competence’ under Article III. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:32 am
On June 14, 2019, some 51 cities and counties filed a motion for certification of a Rule 23(b)(3) negotiation class, drawing objections from State Attorneys General pursuing their own state court claims, and an order from the Court allowing Plaintiffs to re-brief their motion in light of the objections. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am
As a rule, SCOTUS decides questions of federal law, not state law. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:59 am
The other class action complaints: Forest moved to dismiss the Missouri state law claim brought by non-Missouri plaintiffs on choice of law grounds. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
The District Court determined that a controlling question of law was involved, and an immediate appeal would materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 6:31 am
Sounds like medical monitoring, pure and simple.The court finds nine common issues sufficient to justify class treatment, and it makes the same error seen in the United States so often: It accepts common questions that are utterly generic and so would exist in any case. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:13 am
See In re Viterra, 101 USPQ2d at 1908. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 11:11 pm
If you’re an Asian woman, your culture might lead you not to ask specific questions as doing so might be considered “rude” in your country. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 6:57 am
The regulation then further confirms that the other commonly known required recertification that could effect the ability to bid as a small business (or a certain status) is when the solicitation for an order or agreement (such as a BPA) explicitly asks for such re-certification. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:42 pm
They’re going to come across this really important question about permanency. [read post]
