Search for: "IN RE RICHARD C." Results 881 - 900 of 1,401
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 9:51 am by Chris
The network re-aired Stanford Law professor Richard Thompson Ford’s appearance on the show “After Words” which was followed by a three-hour live interview of Harvard Law Professor Randall Kennedy on the monthly program “In Depth. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm by Sasha Volokh
Or the relevant perceiving community may be the inmates themselves rather than the public at large: Richard Lippke writes that “[p]rivate prisons may add insult to injury and thus fuel social discontent, since it may not go unnoticed that such facilities, in effect, turn offenders into raw materials for corporate profit. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Sasha Volokh
Of course, that we all profit from our work (or investment) doesn’t mean we’re all mercenarily minded. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:29 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Seventh Circuit opined that certification of a class with respect to the lawfulness of the challenged practices under Rule 23(c)(4) would be proper. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:06 am
Another fascinating area of substantive overlap, is the arbitrability of company law disputes, which the UKCA in Fulham v David Richards was called on to consider in relation to claims of unfair prejudice. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:57 am by Andrew Sutter
Compare this to the vigorous arguments advanced by Daniel Dennett (on whose understanding of intentionality C&W heavily rely), Richard Dawkins and others for why belief in a deity is a mistake. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:17 am by INFORRM
We’re happy to bend the rules (given that six months is a short time in academic terms) to include them here, and also list some recently published books. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:02 pm by lawmrh
Rule 3.5(c) of the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct provides that a lawyer shall not “engage in undignified or discourteous conduct toward the tribunal. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am by Susan Brenner
” Rule 801(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence defines hearsay as “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:02 am by Susan Brenner
(If you’re interested, you can find the sentencing provisions here.) [read post]