Search for: "In Interest of Joseph T." Results 881 - 900 of 3,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm by Lev Sugarman
The panel will include Norman T. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:28 am by Amy Howe
Either way, the court’s opinion in the case probably won’t come until the spring of 2020. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Allina Health Services, which asks whether the Department of Health and Human Services was required to conduct notice-and-comment rulemaking before altering its Medicare hospital-reimbursement formula, comes from Abbe Gluck and Anne Joseph O’Connell. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:55 pm by Nassiri Law
Oliveira was a somewhat surprising outcome given that the court in recent years has a history of favoring corporate interests over workers. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am by Florian Mueller
Could a politician possibly have a more knowledgeable background to submit such a public-interest statement? [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 11:01 pm by Jeff Richardson
  Fascinating, but don't try this at home. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:56 pm by Inside Privacy
The court described the initial creation of face scans as “[t]he more difficult question. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
The increase in the standard deduction, the repeal of the personal exemption, the creation of a deduction for qualified pass-through business income, the narrowing of the interest deduction, the cap on the state and local tax deduction (which affects state deductions for local property taxes), adjustments to the treatment of net operating losses, and enhanced cost recovery for machinery and equipment purchases, and even some of the provisions on the taxation of international income, flow… [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 6:56 pm by Mitu Gulati
  If some prior Congresses mistakenly thought they didn’t have to comply with the provision or, at some point in history, decided it didn’t feel like complying, who cares. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant, Chuck Rosenberg
” The body of the message read: “Get to [Assange] [a]t Ecuadorian Embassy in London and get the pending [Wikileaks] emails … they deal with [the Clinton Foundation], allegedly. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am by Adam Feldman
Complicating the notion that older precedent is easier to overturn, we don’t arrive at a justice from the 19th century until the fifth in this figure, with Justice Joseph McKenna. [read post]