Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 881 - 900
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2011, 10:20 am
State (2000 Cr LJ 315) and B.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Former MSP Tommy Sheridan has won his appeal on interest on the libel damages he was awarded in 2006 at the rate of 8% per annum ([2018] CSIH 76 [pdf]). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
Analysis The claimant may have won on conversion but for our purposes this judgment is more interesting for its discussion of liability of public authorities in negligence, and of course the failed claims under the Human Rights Act. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am
Here, a number of very interesting questions arise (apart from those identified above concerning the proper interpretation of Art. 4): Did Mr Jacobs’ claim against the MIB constitute a “civil and commercial” matter within Art. 1(1) of the Rome II Regulation? [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
Following on from the Case Preview (here), the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Arnold v Britton & Ors on 10 June 2015 in which the appellants’ appeal was dismissed by a majority of 4-1. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
On the same day Newey LJ granted permission to appeal in the case of Various Claimants v MGN but did not order expedition. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
It is reported that musician and producer Owen Pallett has settled a defamation lawsuit against a woman who accused him of sexual assault, Czechia The intermittently active CzechDefamationLaw blog has an interesting post Violation of presumption of innocence in case of “Nurse death” . [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
Between 1976 and 2004 he led an international existence, establishing and managing business interests in several different countries. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
An interesting apology has been negotiated for HRH The Duchess of Cambridge by the Press Complaints Commission, although a report of the resolved complaint has not yet been published. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:23 pm
Roy Greenslade has an interesting commentary on the divisions in the coverage. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
Between 1976 and 2004 he led an international existence, establishing and managing business interests in several different countries. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
On 20 June 2019 the Court of Appeal (Males LJ) granted Bloomberg LP permission to appeal in the case of ZXC v Bloomberg. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
He has said that he believed he legally had to correct the police commissioner’s comment that he was a person of interest. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
Dingemans LJ and Garnham J held that requests for documents by public inquiries were “bound to lead to the inclusion of some irrelevant material”, but that did not make the request unlawful. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
As Thorpe LJ wryly observed in Lykiardopulo at [32]: “Public interest has never been in the administration of justice in this special field. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
On the same day Mummery LJ heard renewed applications for permission to appeal in the case of Berezovky v Terluk. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
This is ultimately a consequence of the law valuing the accountability of individual wrongdoers over the interests of their states in retaining immunity in relation to all their acts.The definition of this category of cases attaches to the nature of the acts in question, not to the kind of proceedings in which they will become relevant. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:37 pm
Issue: the standard of proof in s.9 applications In Wright v Ver [2020] 1 WLR 3913, Dingemans LJ held (obiter) that the standard of proof in s.9 applications is the ‘balance of probabilities’. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Proceedings in violation of exclusive English jurisdiction agreement In Ebury Partners Belgium SA/NV v Technical Touch BV [2022] EWHC 2927 (Comm), the defendants were interested in receiving foreign exchange currency services from the claimant company. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2006] EWCA Civ 1279, at para. 146, per Laws LJ).Thus, to give some examples, the exclusion of all actions in nuisance (a tort) in relation to the noise from Heathrow Airport was accepted by the ECtHR as removing the potential claimants’ ‘civil rights’ (Powell and Rayner v. [read post]
