Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 881 - 900
of 5,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2021, 1:54 pm
(In re Estrada (1965) 63 Cal.2d 740, 48 Cal.Rptr. 172, 408 P.2d 948 (Estrada) applies to cases when a defendant is placed on probation with a suspended sentence that may be appealed if probation is revoked. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:16 am
The clients don't personally sign, but the attorneys' signatures say they're "for" the clients. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:32 am
If you still don't think that water rights are the next looming frontier of California jurisprudence (as well as other southwestern states), read this opinion.It should change your mind.This is an important field -- just look at the list of counsel on the appeal -- and is only going to get bigger. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm
When you read old cases -- and I mean, really old cases, like from the early 1800s -- you're often struck by how oddness of the reasoning. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 9:28 am
You're sitting in your car, minding your own business, in the parking lot of a motel. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 11:56 am
Because it's right, and if trial courts are holding otherwise -- as one did below here -- I think they need to be told they're doing it wrong.I'm all for finding arbitration provisions to be unconscionable in appropriate cases. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:46 am
The California Supreme Court has set hearings in two cases that we're watching. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
But we’re good sports and truth seekers, so if the staff attorneys can demonstrate that their answer to a question is more right than ours, we will concede that in the answer article.The questions:1. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:46 pm
Knock when you’re here. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:39 pm
When you're going to use your first four peremptory challenges to strike Hispanic jurors, at a minimum, you've got to be more subtle about it. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:43 pm
There's some useful stuff in this opinion about alter ego liability and adding nonparties as judgment debtors, so on the doctrinal front, it's worthy of a read.As for extra-legal lessons learned, I might suggest that one of them might be that if you're planning on getting together with a partner to make usurious loans to poor people over the Internet, it should perhaps not come as a surprise to you when your partner eventually tries 9allegedly) to steal from you; e.g., by… [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 2:25 pm
You're undoubtedly going to see more of this in the years to come.Even if the Legislature won't act to amend the anti-SLAPP statute, the Court of Appeal is starting to take matters into its own hands. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
Don't sign boilerplate settlement agreements that say that you're releasing "everyone" if you want to preserve your right to sue someone else. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 12:26 pm
I didn't know that if you burn down your own property (arson) and accidentally damage your neighbor's property as a result that counts as "vandalism" under California law.I also didn't know that if you're facing criminal charges of arson, and realize that someone (not at your direction) filed an insurance claim for that arson, it doesn't count as a violation of your Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for the state to incarcerate you… [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:13 pm
I understand that, sometimes, you're waiting to try to get better in the meantime, so that the result of the trial is more likely to be in your favor.But having to wait over two full years to be "reevaluated" by your doctors seems quite a bit too long.That's the backstory here, anyway. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:47 pm
You're not going to help yourself. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 12:14 pm
At all.I did not know, however, that at the penalty phase of a criminal trial, when you're deciding on the life and death of a criminal defendant, you can properly admit a 20-minute videotape -- set to Enya songs, no less -- that consists entirely of a lengthy ceremonial tribute to the victim. [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:07 pm
You're no one if you've NOT been sued by Han Jing Huan.Except for the fact that he's now on this list. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
The California Supreme Court recently answered this question in In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal. 4th 298, 93 Cal. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 9:36 am
Cal. 2012)), the Video Privacy Protection Act (addressed in In re Hulu Privacy Litigation, 2012 WL 2119193 (N.D. [read post]
