Search for: "In The Matter Of: D.C"
Results 881 - 900
of 9,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 12:52 pm
Thomas Ferrigno, formerly with Fulbright & Jaworski, focuses his practice on securities enforcement matters. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:16 pm
He has experience in Federal Energy Regulatory Commission transmissions and interconnection matters. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:42 pm
I've written before both here and elsewhere about the problems raised by the D.C. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:25 pm
The D.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:02 pm
Military commission accused Ali Hamza Ahmad Sulaiman al-Bahlul has submitted his response to the government’s petition for rehearing by the full D.C. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 6:41 am
Washington, D.C. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 7:54 am
Former Washington, D.C. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:30 am
You can read more details here: “Pants Judge” Pearson Loses Appeal in D.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:20 am
The President-elect is expected to announce his pick for CTO in a matter of days. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm
Washington, D.C. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
The D.C. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 2:30 pm
Before a 2013 ACLU victory in the D.C. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:04 pm
AND D.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 11:43 am
Plaintiff insureds (“Insureds”) own several restaurants in Washington D.C. that were forced to close and suffered serious revenue losses stemming from the Mayor’s orders to close non-essential businesses and ordering people to stay home. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:26 am
Court D.C. 2010), and Lindsay v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 8:35 pm
Judge Thomas Griffith began service on the D.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm
No matter what the Court says or holds, this case will probably prove to be a landmark. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm
No matter what the Court says or holds, this case will probably prove to be a landmark. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 12:22 pm
The relevant factors supporting this decision included the unrelatedness of the current matter and the European matter, the fact that Howrey's Washington, D.C. office is representing plaintiffs here whereas Howrey's Europe-based attorneys are handling the matter in Europe, and that an ethical wall was in place. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:56 am
(Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post) As we’ve noted before (see here and here), the D.C. federal District Court recently affirmed a ruling by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board canceling federal trademark registration for the name “Redskins,” on the grounds that it violates Section 2 of the Lanham Act, which prohibits registration of trademarks containing “immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter, or matter which… [read post]
