Search for: "Insurance Companies A B C" Results 881 - 900 of 2,988
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2018, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
    Section B – What the Insurance Company Pays   The insurance company agrees to pay for all benefits as defined by the workers’ compensation statutes of the state where the employer does business. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:01 pm
”); Richard Meeran, Leigh Day- Read more (If effectively translated into national laws, the provisions of the Zero Draft would lower the legal and procedural barriers to MNC parent company liability);  Dr Nadia Bernaz, Wageningen University- Read more (The Draft Treaty on Business and Human Rights stays clear of controversy surrounding corporate human rights obligations and criminal responsibility under international law); and Surya Deva, City University of Hong Kong- Read… [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:36 pm by Steven J. Tinnelly, Esq.
**However, somehow the requirement under 4745(f)(1)(C) for the homeowner to, as a condition of approval, agree to provide a certificate of insurance which names the HOA as an additional insured not been changed. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 7:38 am by ccollins
Instead, contends FINRA, these customers were either sold class A shares and paid the front-end charge or class C or B shares that came with back-end sales fees and costly “ongoing fees and expenses. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:37 am by Colby Pastre
This policy undermines tax neutrality and results in particularly heavy tax burdens for companies with longer business cycles. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:31 am by Clayton T. Osteen, Esq.
DOAH October 12, 2016). [2] § 440.02(17)(b)2., Florida Statutes. [3] § 440.02(15)(c), Florida Statutes. [4] § 440.10(1)(b), F.S.; Rule 69L-6.032, Florida Administrative Code. [5] § 440.02(15)(c)2., Florida Statutes. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 11:54 am by Alan L. Friel
Adds a sentence to 1798.150(c) clarifying that the private right of action set forth in §1798.150(a) only applies to “violations” that are security incidents as described in CA CIVIL CODE §1798.150(a). [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
FACTUAL BACKGROUND In October 2017, DFS initiated an investigation of the Carry Guard insurance program, focusing on two insurance companies, Chubb Ltd. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Here is a very interesting case involving just such a company and in which their actions were a central issue. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[10]  However, in practice, the “severe or pervasive” standard has resulted in a mixed bag of decisions, requiring claimants to compare the facts and circumstances of his or her particular case to other cases found to be actionable.[11]             C. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 10:31 am by Jim Baker
Because so many people and companies believe this, AI and the entire technological ecosystem in which it functions are highly valuable to private-sector organizations and nation-states. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 7:26 am by William K. Berenson
Get approval of A, B, and C goals (best case, good, and minimal amounts of money the client will accept). [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Whether it’s substantial similarity or fair use, that’s b/c substantial similarity has grown to encompass so much more than it once did. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm by Ron Miller
The company could not overcome the presumption that blanket bans on such insignia are unlawful under the Act, failing to convince the court of appeals that public image considerations or food safety concerns constituted “special circumstances” justifying the prohibition (In-N-Out Burger, Inc. v NLRB, July 6, 2018, Graves, J., Jr.). 7th Cir.: Supervisor’s use of N-word to deny he was racis [read post]