Search for: "J. Collins" Results 881 - 900 of 1,199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 4:58 am
"Member of local legal family in line for high-profile appointment": Today in The News Journal of Wilmington, Delaware, columnist Harry Themal has an essay that begins, "Delawareans know the name Seitz because Collins J. was one of Delaware's greatest judges and his son, C.J. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  The report and its recommendations were confirmed in a brief order issued last month by Queens County Supreme Court Justice Martin J. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors heard 3 December 2010 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 3:51 am by INFORRM
Tugendhat J later awarded £50,000 damages against the first defendant for libel (see our posts here and here). [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Kent Scheidegger
Collins, 506 U.S. 461, 500 (1993) (Thomas, J., concurring).)The tension between Lockett and Jurek was not fully resolved for many years. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm by JD Hull
("Redford') Greenfield Human Mediation Law, Justin Patten Jim Calloway's Law Practice Tips Blog The Legal Marketing Blog, Tom Kane Law21, Jordan Furlong Legal OnRamp, Paul Lippe More Partner Income, LexisNexis (founded by Tom Collins) Charon QC The Client Revolution, Jay Shepherd Gruntled Employees, Jay Shepherd Golden Practices, Michelle Golden The Adventure of Strategy, Rob Millard Real Lawyers Have Blogs, Kevin O'Keefe The Greatest American Lawyer My… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:53 pm
Traducido del Original: Teen Driver Safety Collins & Collins, P.C. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm by Angus McCullough QC
BC [2009] EWHC 2927 (Admin), Collins J Article 6 was held to apply to so-called “light touch” control orders, imposing less restrictive obligations than the usual control orders that were under consideration in AF (No. 3). [read post]