Search for: "JOHN DOE #3" Results 881 - 900 of 18,945
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2023, 4:02 am by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
Unlike the latter two, however, the author of the source novel is a household name: John Grisham. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 4:46 am by Seán Binder
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 6:55 pm
In this sense commentary augments collective solidarity through guidance by a vanguard or elite invested with a special relation to text.[3] In its most positive form, it can represent “an organic synthesis of the essential and fundamental contents” of doctrine, written and oral.[4]Yet it can also serve the opposite purpose—to expose and resist orthodoxies deepened through the commentary of groups devoted to the protection of a specific way of approaching text, its… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:59 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Doe, I would like to direct your attention to an email sent from John Doe to you on March 3, 2023 that has been remarked as Exhibit X. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 6:07 pm by INFORRM
John, Professor of History and Communications (Columbia University); Michael Schudson, Professor of Journalism and (affiliated faculty) Sociology (Columbia University); and Hawley Johnson, Associate Director, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am by admin
”[3] Mann naturally claims that the defendants’ statements are false and defamatory; the defendants contend that their statements are true. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Michael Stern
., his legislative capacity); (2) his official but non-legislative capacity (which would include executive functions delegated by the president); and (3) his personal or political capacity. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
This post provides a very short introduction to the idea of "public reason"--with a special emphasis on the role of that idea in the work of John Rawls. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by Unknown
The defendants countered this claim by arguing that: 1) Oregon securities law does not apply because the notes were not bought or sold in Oregon, 2) the notes are not securities as a matter of law, and 3) Wilkins made no material misstatements or omissions of fact as a matter of law. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am by Mark A. Graber
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman claim that the 14th Amendment does not apply to the U.S. president. [read post]