Search for: "JOHNSON v. SHORT" Results 881 - 900 of 1,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Sajar Plastics[7th Cir.]o 7th Defines Who Is A Supervisor Under Title VIIAndonissany v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm by Josh Blackman
  In short, the House and Senate have a limited law-making role in impeachment proceedings. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
For that point, the brief sites Seymour v. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:55 am by Sam E. Antar
During a November 18, 2009 conference call, Jonathan Johnson reiterated the company's claim in its 8-K: We wound up -- our Audit Committee wound up engaging Grant Thornton. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]