Search for: "James v. Appel" Results 881 - 900 of 2,973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2011, 7:56 pm by cdw
First look at this week’s edition includes: Favorable for the Accused or Condemend: James Lambert v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:30 am
On appeal, Appellants contend the court abused its discretion by entering the stay. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Such was the holding of the Appellate Division, Second Department, in its July 31, 2013 decision in Kiernan v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
That, in a nutshell, is the burden that appellant James LeShore has shouldered here. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm by Kevin Sheerin
”   Citing Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 109 AD2d 92, affd 67 NY2d 562, the Appellate Division said that the legislative history of §50-a indicates that the "statute was intended to apply to situations where a party to an underlying criminal or civil action is seeking documents in a police officer's personnel file, and was apparently designed to prevent 'fishing expeditions' to find material to use in cross-examination. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 5:35 am
LUMBERMSN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Insurer for BUTTREY FOOD & DRUG, Employer and Appellee. --- James ZENAHLIK Petitioner and Appellant v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:29 pm by Jeffrey Brown
Therefore, sufficient probable cause existed for the search.RELATED CASE: Almost the same situation arose in another Georgia appellate case involving a report from Google to NCMEC in James v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 12:18 pm
The People of the State ... ... appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (James A. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 3:59 am by SHG
As reflected in the dissent by Judge James Dennis, it really wasn’t an issue at all. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:27 am
The Appellate Court began its analysis of Gojcaj’s argument by explaining that at trial,the state elicited testimony from James Corbett, a partner of United Alarm Services. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:05 am by Laura Sandwell
Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v James, heard 24 July 2013. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am by Eric Goldman
It could have simply let the appellate court ruling stand and not wasted everyone’s time and money. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:53 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 30 October 2013 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust v James, R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, and In the matter of “The Alexandros T” (Nos. 1, 2 and 3. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:22 am
[which begins:] I concur in the majority's resolution of the restitution issue; however, I respectfully dissent from the majority's Appellate Rule 7(B) analysis.In Michael Swenson v. [read post]