Search for: "Jennings v. Jennings" Results 881 - 900 of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
Moreover, according to the defendant's own submissions by reference to Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, it is a principle which enables the court to modify the parties' substantive rights in order to achieve what it regards as a just solution in the particular case I conclude, therefore, that the defendant cannot rely on principles of estoppel to avoid liability in this case. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am by Joshua Matz
  Bill Mears of CNN has coverage, as do MSNBC, Jen Chaney of the Washington Post, and Cameron Matthews of Spinner. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:15 am by Ronald Mann
If you think those cases aren’t on the front burner for the justices this spring, consider the last section of the blockbuster immigration opinion in Jennings v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:20 am by Lyle Denniston
In the other case in which the Court granted review on Monday, Jennings v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also ordered reargument in two immigration cases, Jennings v. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
The case shows up in a database used by lawyers, but as Confidential v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:27 am
Jennifer "Jen" Seelig--who voted yes on HB 450, in case that wasn't obvious--is a lobbyist-employee of 1-800 Contacts, the principal advocate for the bill. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 7:32 am
Jennings, No. 83-727 and Bowen v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am by John Elwood
Guzman Chavez, 19-897, are sequels to Jennings v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm by Mark Walsh
Next, the chief justice announces that Jennings v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Preap, 16-1363, which like the recently decided Jennings v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  But Chiang’s message is about the language of orphan v. troll. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:22 am by David Smith
The RPT has stated in some decisions that it sees the RRO as a punishment (see for example the decision of the Midland RPT in Jennings & Others v Malik) but when calculating how much to return to the occupiers it tends to look at the condition of the property and its reduced value to the tenants due to its failure to be in a condition which it would need to be in to obtain a property licence. [read post]