Search for: "John Does 1 to 10" Results 881 - 900 of 5,473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2019, 5:42 am by Daniel Shaviro
Yesterday at the colloquium, John Friedman presented work in progress from his big-data project with Raj Chetty, Emmanuel Saez, Nicholas Turner, and Danny Yagan. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 5:29 pm
[A question no one asked: if there are 47 million uninsured, how does a public option that covers only 10 million in total solve the uninsured problem? [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:44 am by Broc Romanek
John has come up with your “11-step plan of action” if one of your company’s filings on Edgar is hacked: 1. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
John Doe's preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for 9 a.m. in Superior Court 1. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 6:56 pm by Russell Beck
Ct. 1, 10 n.17 (1981) and Jet Spray Cooler, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 11:18 am by David Post
On the other side of the scale, these 14 states show a “deficit”; they receive less than $1 for each $1 paid in federal taxes: California, Massachusetts, Wyoming, Oklahoma, New Jersey, Utah, Colorado, New York, Kansas, Ohio, Nebraska, Illinois, Minnesota and Delaware (47.5 percent). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:57 am
But the clause certainly does not allow regulating foreign conduct that has no connection to the U.S. if it is not a universal crime in international law. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 12:32 am
" Hydra does not create the ad content or send the actual emails. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm by Josh Blackman
Rev. 443, 472 (2018) (citing 1 Farrand's Records, supra note 21, at 20–22, 20 n.10). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:41 pm by Steve Bainbridge
" Slate explains: On Feb. 10, 2010, Palm Beach air-conditioning mogul John Goodman allegedly ran a stop sign. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  Does the fact that this particular sort of statutory violation would also result in an Appropriations Clause violation confer standing on the House that it otherwise wouldn’t have? [read post]