Search for: "Jones v. Billings" Results 881 - 900 of 1,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Jones, 298 N.W.2d 296, 298 (Iowa 1980). [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
Circuit case, on behalf of Professors Walter Dellinger, Bill Eskridge and David Strauss, arguing that the House lacks standing to sue on such an Appropriations Clause claim. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Michelle
Sponsor Shevrin Jones, D-Miami Gardens, said the bill would address challenges faced by people who rely on paying cash. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
(summary judgment for Citibank on multiple theories of recovery reversed, including breach of contract, where agreement on interest rate applied on billing statements had not been proven).Requirement to prove agreement on credit terms not enforced: Devine v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
In 1997, as acting solicitor general for President Bill Clinton, Dellinger argued in Clinton v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm by John Elwood
There, the solicitor general recommends the court dismiss the bill of complaint and not let the matter proceed. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  Simply to provide some organizing principle, I have broken the issues down according to whether they rise under the body of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, or statutes. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
We mentioned the British Columbia case of Lawson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
 Thus, a ‘disinterested witness’ does not stand to gain a benefit or suffer a detriment as a result of the outcome of the case, Jones v. [read post]