Search for: "Kelly v. United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 975
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2008, 11:10 pm
Carcieri, the state itself, and the town of Charlestown — were united in the claim that the federal government has no authority to do that for the Narragansetts. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 3:15 pm
Ct., Erie Co., decided 10/16/2008)In what appears to be a case of first impression, the Erie County Supreme Court has declined to apply the equitable considerations outlined in the United States Supreme Court Medicaid-lien case Arkansas Dept. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 7:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
United States (06-11206), Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 8:47 am
In Bell v Kelly, the Court has agreed to examine some part of this quandary. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:14 am
Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 271 (1970) (termination of welfare benefits). 2 Tumey v.Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 532 (1927) (judge may not have a personal interest in costs assessed against convicted defendants); Ward v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
Douglas Floyd, THREE FACES OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AFTER THE DEMISE OF UNITED MINE WORKERS v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:00 am
In State of Arizona v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 4:00 am
United States (06-11206) and Thursday in Peake v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 6:11 pm
Kelly (No. 07-1223). [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 3:41 pm
A more likely interpertation is, that materials purchased for mass production of such videos crossed state lines, is what Congress had in mind, not the construction used to charge Blum in this case.For reasons that are a mystery to this writer, it seens this was not brought up on appeal, and the appeals court went off on a tangent of possession of child porn, see appellate court decision: USA -v- Gregory Blum . [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 1:38 am
United National Specialty Ins. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:29 pm
In the appropriately named Liberty v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:29 am
" The case is United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 8:34 am
Humphries and Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 1:34 pm
In NMCCA's en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Kelly S. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:14 pm
Crime and Consequences reports that the Federalist Society has a new podcast available discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:14 am
Kelly Wilder Gates (NFP) - "Appellant James A. [read post]
